The United States
has a moral obligation to mitigate the effects of climate change. According to
a report by the Global Humanitarian Forum “Climate change is the greatest
emerging humanitarian challenge of our times.” The 2007 UN Human Development
Program (UNHDP) report noted that climate change will bring about
“unprecedented reversals in poverty reduction, nutrition, health and education”
as the limited resources of vulnerable nations are used to mitigate the
droughts, floods and other environmental stressors of climate change rather
than dealing with social needs. Furthermore according to a report by the Global
Humanitarian Forum, 300,000 lives are lost each year due to climate change,
with an annual death toll estimated to reach 500,000 by 2030. It is imperative
that the United States intervenes on the behalf of developing nations in order
to mitigate these negative outcomes.
According to the
Josephoninstitute, agreement is a source of moral obligation “even if an
agreement doesn’t reach the level of an enforceable contract, there is a moral
obligation to do the things we agree to do, especially if others are counting
on us to do so.” In the 2010 COP new pledges have been made by developed
countries (including the US) to jointly mobilize 30 billion dollars a year for
the period of 2010-2012, and 100 billion dollars a year by 2020 to address the
mitigation and adaptation needs of developing countries. Furthermore at the
Bali conference, the US along with other developed nations agreed to provide
financial and technological assistance to developing countries, to help them
adapt to climate change. These pledges morally bind the US to provide
assistance to developing nations in order to mitigate the effects of climate
change.
According to the
Journal of Ethics and the Environment, in our present circumstances, those who
have contributed the most to climate change are those who are the least
vulnerable and the best able to adapt to the impacts of climate change (with,
for example, heating and air conditioning, dikes, irrigation, and increased
health care), while those who have contributed the least are the most
vulnerable and the least able to adapt to the consequences of climate change
(e.g., drought, desertification, flooding, and extreme weather patterns.)
Furthermore according to the Economist, even though developing countries
account for 80% of the world population, their citizens’ carbon footprints are
much smaller than those of citizens of developed nations. Based on moral
reasoning, those countries that are proportionally the most responsible for
climate change should also bear the proportional responsibility for mitigating
the effects of their abuses. Since the United States has contributed greatly to
the rise in carbon emissions, it has a responsibility to the rest of the world
to help lessen the severity of the problem.
No comments:
Post a Comment